Radeon RX 7900M vs GeForce GTX 1070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 1070
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
34.95

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking13734
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.96no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3
GPU code namePascal GP104Navi 31
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2016 (8 years ago)19 October 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$379 no data
Current price$180 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19204608
CUDA cores1920no data
Core clock speed1506 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt180 Watt (160 - 200 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate202.0601.9
Floating-point performance6,463 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1070 and Radeon RX 7900M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVIPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 34.95
RX 7900M 56.99
+63.1%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 by 63% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1070 13512
RX 7900M 22033
+63.1%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 by 63% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1070 24652
RX 7900M 59943
+143%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 by 143% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1070 18255
RX 7900M 50241
+175%

Radeon RX 7900M outperforms GeForce GTX 1070 by 175% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD121
−19.8%
145
+19.8%
1440p67
−58.2%
106
+58.2%
4K51
−54.9%
79
+54.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 89
−1.1%
90−95
+1.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−60.7%
95−100
+60.7%
Battlefield 5 164
−10.4%
180−190
+10.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 91
−35.2%
120−130
+35.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Far Cry 5 109
+11.2%
95−100
−11.2%
Far Cry New Dawn 110
−15.5%
120−130
+15.5%
Forza Horizon 4 129
−29.5%
160−170
+29.5%
Hitman 3 85−90
−55.2%
130−140
+55.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−84.4%
230−240
+84.4%
Metro Exodus 127
+4.1%
120−130
−4.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 115
−1.7%
110−120
+1.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
−90.5%
220−230
+90.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−55.4%
100−110
+55.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 76
−18.4%
90−95
+18.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−60.7%
95−100
+60.7%
Battlefield 5 152
−19.1%
180−190
+19.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 103
−19.4%
120−130
+19.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Far Cry 5 75
−12%
84
+12%
Far Cry New Dawn 91
−39.6%
120−130
+39.6%
Forza Horizon 4 121
−38%
160−170
+38%
Hitman 3 85−90
−55.2%
130−140
+55.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−84.4%
230−240
+84.4%
Metro Exodus 101
−20.8%
120−130
+20.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 103
−13.6%
110−120
+13.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 39
−154%
99
+154%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120
−35.8%
160−170
+35.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−55.4%
100−110
+55.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55
−63.6%
90−95
+63.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
−60.7%
95−100
+60.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 61
−102%
120−130
+102%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
−58.3%
95−100
+58.3%
Far Cry 5 66
−48.5%
95−100
+48.5%
Forza Horizon 4 94
−77.7%
160−170
+77.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
−84.4%
230−240
+84.4%
Metro Exodus 91
−34.1%
120−130
+34.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
−167%
168
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−55.4%
100−110
+55.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 93
−25.8%
110−120
+25.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 71
−71.8%
120−130
+71.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 73
−79.5%
130−140
+79.5%
Hitman 3 45−50
−48.9%
70−75
+48.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
−85.2%
50−55
+85.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
−37.8%
60−65
+37.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
−78.9%
65−70
+78.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60
−50%
90−95
+50%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
−53.8%
40−45
+53.8%
Far Cry 5 68
−80.9%
123
+80.9%
Forza Horizon 4 79
−63.3%
120−130
+63.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−80%
130−140
+80%
Metro Exodus 71
−40.8%
100−105
+40.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
−200%
249
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
−97.9%
95−100
+97.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−96.7%
55−60
+96.7%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 66
+3.1%
64
−3.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−118%
80−85
+118%
Hitman 3 27−30
−71.4%
45−50
+71.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−88.4%
80−85
+88.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 26
−192%
76
+192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
−170%
116
+170%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26
−61.5%
40−45
+61.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
−95.2%
40−45
+95.2%
Battlefield 5 45
−57.8%
70−75
+57.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
−69.4%
60−65
+69.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−67.3%
85−90
+67.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−88.4%
80−85
+88.4%
Metro Exodus 38
−71.1%
65−70
+71.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−94.1%
30−35
+94.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 34
−64.7%
55−60
+64.7%

This is how GTX 1070 and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 20% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 58% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 55% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1070 is 11% faster than the RX 7900M.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900M is 200% faster than the GTX 1070.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 is ahead in 3 tests (5%)
  • RX 7900M is ahead in 63 tests (95%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.95 56.99
Recency 6 May 2016 19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 180 Watt

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1070 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7900M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 7487 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 45 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.