Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1080

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GTX 1080
2016
8 GB GDDR5X
40.14
+25.7%

GeForce GTX 1080 outperforms Quadro P5200 Max-Q by a significant 26% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking94162
Place by popularity63not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.40no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePascal GP104GP104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date6 May 2016 (8 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data
Current price$241 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores25602560
CUDA cores2560no data
Core clock speed1607 MHz1316 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1569 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt100 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate277.3251.0
Floating-point performance8,873 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1080 and Quadro P5200 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pinNone
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10 GB/s7216 MHz
Memory bandwidth320 GB/s230.9 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 40.14
+25.7%
P5200 Max-Q 31.93

GeForce GTX 1080 outperforms Quadro P5200 Max-Q by 26% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1080 15532
+25.7%
P5200 Max-Q 12355

GeForce GTX 1080 outperforms Quadro P5200 Max-Q by 26% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD128
+28%
100−110
−28%
1440p77
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
4K58
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92
+31.4%
70−75
−31.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Battlefield 5 166
+27.7%
130−140
−27.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 134
+34%
100−105
−34%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Far Cry 5 118
+31.1%
90−95
−31.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 111
+30.6%
85−90
−30.6%
Forza Horizon 4 140
+27.3%
110−120
−27.3%
Hitman 3 120−130
+28%
100−105
−28%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+33.8%
65−70
−33.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 96
+28%
75−80
−28%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 108
+27.1%
85−90
−27.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 83
+27.7%
65−70
−27.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Battlefield 5 142
+29.1%
110−120
−29.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 113
+32.9%
85−90
−32.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Far Cry 5 113
+32.9%
85−90
−32.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 108
+27.1%
85−90
−27.1%
Forza Horizon 4 137
+37%
100−105
−37%
Hitman 3 120−130
+28%
100−105
−28%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+33.8%
65−70
−33.8%
Metro Exodus 74
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 53
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 98
+30.7%
75−80
−30.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+26%
50−55
−26%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 70−75
+27.3%
55−60
−27.3%
Battlefield 5 123
+29.5%
95−100
−29.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+29.1%
55−60
−29.1%
Far Cry 5 104
+30%
80−85
−30%
Far Cry New Dawn 98
+30.7%
75−80
−30.7%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+31.8%
85−90
−31.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+35%
60−65
−35%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 74
+34.5%
55−60
−34.5%
Hitman 3 75−80
+36.4%
55−60
−36.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+26.7%
45−50
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 45
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 64
+28%
50−55
−28%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+40%
35−40
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+28.6%
35−40
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 98
+30.7%
75−80
−30.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 77
+28.3%
60−65
−28.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 82
+26.2%
65−70
−26.2%
Forza Horizon 4 93
+32.9%
70−75
−32.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Hitman 3 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+29.2%
24−27
−29.2%
Metro Exodus 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+40%
40−45
−40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Battlefield 5 53
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Far Cry 5 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+30%
50−55
−30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%

This is how GTX 1080 and P5200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 is 28% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 is 28% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 is 29% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.14 31.93
Recency 6 May 2016 21 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 100 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 is a desktop card while Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4664 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 11 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.