Radeon RX 7600M XT vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Ti
2017
11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
41.61
+42.6%

GTX 1080 Ti outperforms RX 7600M XT by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking75170
Place by popularity36not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation20.14no data
Power efficiency13.1719.20
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGP102Navi 33
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date10 March 2017 (8 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35842048
Core clock speed1481 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz2469 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.4316.0
Floating-point processing power11.34 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs8864
TMUs224128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount11 GB8 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1376 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1080 Ti 41.61
+42.6%
RX 7600M XT 29.17

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
    • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04
    • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03
    • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02
    • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04
    • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01
    • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01
    • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01
    • SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18589
+42.7%
RX 7600M XT 13031

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1080 Ti 37672
RX 7600M XT 38039
+1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 Ti 27564
RX 7600M XT 28686
+4.1%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 Ti 142490
RX 7600M XT 155836
+9.4%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 Ti 394694
RX 7600M XT 453957
+15%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1080 Ti 175
RX 7600M XT 202
+15.5%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1080 Ti 68
RX 7600M XT 218
+223%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1080 Ti 10
RX 7600M XT 186
+1760%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1080 Ti 105
RX 7600M XT 230
+119%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1080 Ti 60
RX 7600M XT 87
+44.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1080 Ti 58
RX 7600M XT 112
+91.3%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 1080 Ti 149
+25.9%
RX 7600M XT 119

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

GTX 1080 Ti 148
RX 7600M XT 206
+39.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD129
+8.4%
119
−8.4%
1440p84
+40%
60
−40%
4K67
+103%
33
−103%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.42no data
1440p8.32no data
4K10.43no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
−34%
331
+34%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
−8.4%
116
+8.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
−35.2%
146
+35.2%
Battlefield 5 166
+43.1%
110−120
−43.1%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
−28.3%
317
+28.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+11.5%
96
−11.5%
Far Cry 5 120
−5.8%
127
+5.8%
Fortnite 190−200
+33.6%
140−150
−33.6%
Forza Horizon 4 147
−66.7%
245
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
−40.1%
192
+40.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
−2.8%
111
+2.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 125
−0.8%
120−130
+0.8%
Valorant 250−260
+28.1%
190−200
−28.1%
Battlefield 5 154
+32.8%
110−120
−32.8%
Counter-Strike 2 240−250
+50.6%
164
−50.6%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+1.1%
270−280
−1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+32.1%
81
−32.1%
Dota 2 133
−2.3%
130−140
+2.3%
Far Cry 5 117
−8.5%
127
+8.5%
Fortnite 203
+42%
140−150
−42%
Forza Horizon 4 145
−63.4%
237
+63.4%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
−30.7%
179
+30.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 120
−10.8%
133
+10.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+27.1%
85
−27.1%
Metro Exodus 90
−8.9%
98
+8.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 115
−9.6%
120−130
+9.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
−10.7%
186
+10.7%
Valorant 250−260
+28.1%
190−200
−28.1%
Battlefield 5 149
+28.4%
110−120
−28.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+44.6%
74
−44.6%
Dota 2 125
−8.8%
130−140
+8.8%
Far Cry 5 109
−10.1%
120
+10.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120
−50%
180
+50%
Hogwarts Legacy 100−110
+66.2%
65
−66.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 102
−23.5%
120−130
+23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
−7.1%
105
+7.1%
Valorant 179
−9.5%
190−200
+9.5%
Fortnite 163
+14%
140−150
−14%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+44%
84
−44%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+43.1%
210−220
−43.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 84
+20%
70
−20%
Metro Exodus 56
−3.6%
58
+3.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 280−290
+20.2%
230−240
−20.2%
Battlefield 5 118
+40.5%
80−85
−40.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+14.6%
48
−14.6%
Far Cry 5 97
−5.2%
102
+5.2%
Forza Horizon 4 102
−39.2%
142
+39.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 55−60
+27.9%
43
−27.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+21.1%
76
−21.1%
Fortnite 107
+33.8%
80−85
−33.8%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+162%
21
−162%
Grand Theft Auto V 98
+32.4%
74
−32.4%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+45%
20−22
−45%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+35.8%
53
−35.8%
Valorant 260−270
+41.6%
190−200
−41.6%
Battlefield 5 70
+42.9%
45−50
−42.9%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+120%
25
−120%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+13.6%
22
−13.6%
Dota 2 125
+30.2%
95−100
−30.2%
Far Cry 5 55
+7.8%
51
−7.8%
Forza Horizon 4 75
−20%
90
+20%
Hogwarts Legacy 27−30
+26.1%
23
−26.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45
+18.4%
35−40
−18.4%
Fortnite 51
+34.2%
35−40
−34.2%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is 8% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 40% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 103% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Ti is 162% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 7600M XT is 67% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is ahead in 37 tests (56%)
  • RX 7600M XT is ahead in 27 tests (41%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 41.61 29.17
Recency 10 March 2017 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has a 42.6% higher aggregate performance score, and a 37.5% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RX 7600M XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 7600M XT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3
10937 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
75 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Ti or Radeon RX 7600M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.