GeForce RTX 3090 Ti vs GTX 1080 Ti

Place in the ranking	68	10
Place by popularity	44	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	20.52	8.30
Power efficiency	13.34	11.83
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GP102	GA102
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	10 March 2017 (7 years ago)	27 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1080 Ti has 147% better value for money than RTX 3090 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	10752
Core clock speed	1481 MHz	1560 MHz
Boost clock speed	1582 MHz	1860 MHz
Number of transistors	11,800 million	28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	450 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	91 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	354.4	625.0
Floating-point processing power	11.34 TFLOPS	40 TFLOPS
ROPs	88	112
TMUs	224	336
Tensor Cores	no data	336
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	336 mm
Width	2-slot	3-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)	600 Watt	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 16-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5X	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	352 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1376 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	484.4 GB/s	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	3.0	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Ti 48.34

RTX 3090 Ti 77.16
+59.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Ti 18579

RTX 3090 Ti 29656
+59.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1080 Ti 37672

RTX 3090 Ti 69481
+84.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 Ti 27564

RTX 3090 Ti 53110
+92.7%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 Ti 142490

RTX 3090 Ti 246319
+72.9%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 Ti 394694

RTX 3090 Ti 564087
+42.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	131 −67.9%	220 +67.9%
1440p	83 −84.3%	153 +84.3%
4K	70 −54.3%	108 +54.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	5.34 +70.3%	9.09 −70.3%
1440p	8.42 +55.1%	13.07 −55.1%
4K	9.99 +85.4%	18.51 −85.4%

GTX 1080 Ti has 70% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1080 Ti has 55% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 1080 Ti has 85% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	100−110 −69.2%	180−190 +69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 −107%	219 +107%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	82 −42.7%	110−120 +42.7%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 −69.2%	180−190 +69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +5%	101 −5%
Forza Horizon 4	247 −78.5%	400−450 +78.5%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 −67.2%	200−210 +67.2%
Metro Exodus	104 −46.2%	150−160 +46.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	90−95 −56%	140−150 +56%
Valorant	200−210 −114%	400−450 +114%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	149 +27.4%	110−120 −27.4%
Counter-Strike 2	100−110 −69.2%	180−190 +69.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	100−110 +23.3%	86 −23.3%
Dota 2	124 −49.2%	185 +49.2%
Far Cry 5	86 −58.1%	136 +58.1%
Fortnite	190−200 −55.6%	300−350 +55.6%
Forza Horizon 4	196 −125%	400−450 +125%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 −69.7%	207 +69.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	120 −41.7%	170 +41.7%
Metro Exodus	86 +17.8%	73 −17.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	229 +6.5%	210−220 −6.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65 −118%	140−150 +118%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85 −105%	170−180 +105%
Valorant	123 −247%	400−450 +247%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 −58.1%	110−120 +58.1%
Counter-Strike 2	60 −202%	180−190 +202%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 −171%	76 +171%
Dota 2	125 −56%	195 +56%
Far Cry 5	100−110 −35.5%	140−150 +35.5%
Forza Horizon 4	167 −164%	400−450 +164%
Forza Horizon 5	120−130 −67.2%	200−210 +67.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	109 −97.2%	210−220 +97.2%
Valorant	179 −139%	400−450 +139%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	84 −79.8%	151 +79.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	84 −79.8%	151 +79.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	41 −127%	90−95 +127%
World of Tanks	300−350 −68.1%	500−550 +68.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	72 −20.8%	85−90 +20.8%
Counter-Strike 2	37 −195%	100−110 +195%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 −189%	52 +189%
Far Cry 5	150−160 −5.3%	160−170 +5.3%
Forza Horizon 4	123 −144%	300−310 +144%
Forza Horizon 5	80−85 −80.7%	150 +80.7%
Metro Exodus	88 −54.5%	130−140 +54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90−95 −93.5%	170−180 +93.5%
Valorant	131 −176%	350−400 +176%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	50−55 −88.7%	100−105 +88.7%
Dota 2	98 −84.7%	181 +84.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	98 −84.7%	181 +84.7%
Metro Exodus	35 −140%	84 +140%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	132 −58.3%	200−210 +58.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27 −137%	60−65 +137%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	98 −84.7%	181 +84.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	52 −75%	90−95 +75%
Counter-Strike 2	50−55 −88.7%	100−105 +88.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	8 −238%	27 +238%
Dota 2	125 −47.2%	184 +47.2%
Far Cry 5	77 −36.4%	100−110 +36.4%
Fortnite	65 −47.7%	95−100 +47.7%
Forza Horizon 4	72 −126%	160−170 +126%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 −91.8%	94 +91.8%
Valorant	68 −209%	210−220 +209%

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and RTX 3090 Ti compete in popular games:

RTX 3090 Ti is 68% faster in 1080p
RTX 3090 Ti is 84% faster in 1440p
RTX 3090 Ti is 54% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Ti is 27% faster.
in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3090 Ti is 247% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1080 Ti is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
RTX 3090 Ti is ahead in 57 tests (89%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	48.34	77.16
Recency	10 March 2017	27 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	11 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	250 Watt	450 Watt

GTX 1080 Ti has 80% lower power consumption.

RTX 3090 Ti, on the other hand, has a 59.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 118.2% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3090 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1080 Ti in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.