GeForce GTX 680MX vs 1080 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Ti with GeForce GTX 680MX, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Ti
2017
11 GB GDDR5X, 250 Watt
48.07
+348%

1080 Ti outperforms 680MX by a whopping 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking60396
Place by popularity48not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.269.02
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP102no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date28 February 2017 (7 years ago)23 October 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data
Current price$321 (0.5x MSRP)$200

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1080 Ti has 202% better value for money than GTX 680MX.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores35841536
CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed1481 MHz720 MHz
Boost clock speed1600 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million3540 Million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt122 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature91 °Cno data
Texture fill rate354.492.2 billion/sec
Floating-point performance11,340 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1080 Ti and GeForce GTX 680MX compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length10.5" (26.7 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options++

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount11 GB2 GB
Memory bus width352 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed11000 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth484.4 GB/s160 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Visionno data+
GPU Boost3.0no data
Optimusno data+
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 API
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+no data
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Ti 48.07
+348%
GTX 680MX 10.73

1080 Ti outperforms 680MX by 348% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1080 Ti 18563
+348%
GTX 680MX 4142

1080 Ti outperforms 680MX by 348% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1080 Ti 37672
+459%
GTX 680MX 6736

1080 Ti outperforms 680MX by 459% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 1080 Ti 63160
+418%
GTX 680MX 12197

1080 Ti outperforms 680MX by 418% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 1080 Ti 55161
+388%
GTX 680MX 11307

1080 Ti outperforms 680MX by 388% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130
+150%
52
−150%
1440p86
+378%
18−20
−378%
4K69
+393%
14−16
−393%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 85−90 no data

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85 no data
Battlefield 5 162 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 122 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 147 no data
Hitman 3 95−100 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 213 no data
Metro Exodus 144 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 247 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120 no data

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 90 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85 no data
Battlefield 5 147 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 96 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 59 no data
Forza Horizon 4 284 no data
Hitman 3 95−100 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200 no data
Metro Exodus 123 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 196 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120 no data

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 71 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80−85 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 81 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90 no data
Far Cry 5 73 no data
Forza Horizon 4 120 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 153 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 110−120 no data

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 121 no data

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 108 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 112 no data

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55−60 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 78 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 no data
Far Cry 5 97 no data
Forza Horizon 4 102 no data
Hitman 3 65−70 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 118 no data
Metro Exodus 88 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50 no data

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 98 no data

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 56 no data
Far Cry New Dawn 69 no data
Hitman 3 40−45 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70 no data
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 41 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72 no data

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40 no data
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 37 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 no data
Far Cry 5 31 no data
Forza Horizon 4 75 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 72 no data
Metro Exodus 57 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 24−27 no data

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 49 no data

This is how GTX 1080 Ti and GTX 680MX compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Ti is 150% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 378% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Ti is 393% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 48.07 10.73
Recency 28 February 2017 23 October 2012
Maximum RAM amount 11 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 122 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 680MX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 680MX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX
GeForce GTX 680MX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 8603 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 24 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 680MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.