Quadro K5000 vs GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Ti with Quadro K5000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 Ti
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
32.89
+269%

GTX 1070 Ti outperforms K5000 by a whopping 269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134454
Place by popularity99not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation26.420.66
Power efficiency14.505.80
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP104GK104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 November 2017 (7 years ago)17 August 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1070 Ti has 3903% better value for money than Quadro K5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24321536
Core clock speed1607 MHz706 MHz
Boost clock speed1683 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt122 Watt
Texture fill rate255.890.37
Floating-point processing power8.186 TFLOPS2.169 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs152128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2002 MHz1350 MHz
Memory bandwidth256.3 GB/s172.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA6.13.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1070 Ti 32.89
+269%
Quadro K5000 8.92

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Ti 14694
+269%
Quadro K5000 3987

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1070 Ti 55390
+383%
Quadro K5000 11460

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1070 Ti 61154
+435%
Quadro K5000 11428

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 1070 Ti 49727
+481%
Quadro K5000 8558

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD112
+273%
30−35
−273%
1440p72
+300%
18−20
−300%
4K54
+286%
14−16
−286%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.56
+2238%
83.30
−2238%
1440p5.54
+2405%
138.83
−2405%
4K7.39
+2316%
178.50
−2316%
  • GTX 1070 Ti has 2238% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Ti has 2405% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 Ti has 2316% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+304%
50−55
−304%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+304%
50−55
−304%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
Far Cry 5 114
+280%
30−33
−280%
Fortnite 150−160
+290%
40−45
−290%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+291%
35−40
−291%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+270%
30−33
−270%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+303%
35−40
−303%
Valorant 210−220
+285%
55−60
−285%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 120−130
+317%
30−33
−317%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+304%
50−55
−304%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+269%
75−80
−269%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
Dota 2 127
+323%
30−33
−323%
Far Cry 5 108
+300%
27−30
−300%
Fortnite 150−160
+290%
40−45
−290%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+291%
35−40
−291%
Forza Horizon 5 110−120
+270%
30−33
−270%
Grand Theft Auto V 120−130
+300%
30−33
−300%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
Metro Exodus 66
+313%
16−18
−313%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+303%
35−40
−303%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 120−130
+303%
30−33
−303%
Valorant 210−220
+285%
55−60
−285%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 111
+270%
30−33
−270%
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
Dota 2 121
+303%
30−33
−303%
Far Cry 5 102
+278%
27−30
−278%
Forza Horizon 4 100
+270%
27−30
−270%
Hogwarts Legacy 80−85
+286%
21−24
−286%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+303%
35−40
−303%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+300%
18−20
−300%
Valorant 210−220
+285%
55−60
−285%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 109
+304%
27−30
−304%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+271%
24−27
−271%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+275%
65−70
−275%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+294%
18−20
−294%
Metro Exodus 40
+300%
10−11
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+289%
45−50
−289%
Valorant 240−250
+278%
65−70
−278%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+295%
21−24
−295%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
Far Cry 5 75
+317%
18−20
−317%
Forza Horizon 4 81
+286%
21−24
−286%
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45
+310%
10−11
−310%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+306%
16−18
−306%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 72
+300%
18−20
−300%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+310%
10−11
−310%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+272%
18−20
−272%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Metro Exodus 25
+317%
6−7
−317%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
+292%
12−14
−292%
Valorant 210−220
+291%
55−60
−291%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+292%
12−14
−292%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+310%
10−11
−310%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Dota 2 105
+289%
27−30
−289%
Far Cry 5 39
+290%
10−11
−290%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+293%
14−16
−293%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+275%
12−14
−275%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 36
+300%
9−10
−300%

This is how GTX 1070 Ti and Quadro K5000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Ti is 273% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Ti is 300% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 Ti is 286% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.89 8.92
Recency 2 November 2017 17 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 122 Watt

GTX 1070 Ti has a 268.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro K5000, on the other hand, has 47.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro K5000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro K5000
Quadro K5000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 4057 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 111 votes

Rate Quadro K5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1070 Ti or Quadro K5000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.