ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
- Interface MXM-II
- Core clock speed 120MHz
- Max video memory 1024 MB
- Memory type GDDR2, GDDR3
- Memory clock speed 800
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 2.0 x16
- Core clock speed 550
- Max video memory 1024 MB
- Memory type DDR3, GDDR5?
- Memory clock speed 800
- Maximum resolution
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Architecture | G9x (2007−2010) | Terascale 2 (2009−2015) |
GPU code name | NB9P-GS | Park LP |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 4 June 2008 (15 years old) | 7 January 2010 (13 years old) |
Current price | $287 | no data |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 80 |
CUDA cores | 32 | no data |
Core clock speed | 120 MHz | 550 MHz |
Number of transistors | 314 million | 292 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 7 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 8.000 | 4.000 |
Floating-point performance | 80 gflops | 80 gflops |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce 9600M GT and Mobility Radeon HD 5430 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR2, GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR5? |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
GeForce 9600M GT outperforms Mobility Radeon HD 5430 by 52% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.
Advantages and disadvantages
Recency | 4 June 2008 | 7 January 2010 |
Memory bus width | 128 | 64 |
Memory bandwidth | 25.6 | 12.8 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 80 |
Chip lithography | 65 nm | 40 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 23 Watt | 7 Watt |
We couldn't decide between GeForce 9600M GT and Mobility Radeon HD 5430. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.