Radeon RX 6750 XT vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Place in performance ranking	202	40
Place by popularity	27	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.31	30.02
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GP106	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	18 August 2016 (7 years ago)	3 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$199	$549
Current price	$1112 (5.6x MSRP)	$559 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6750 XT has 1200% better value for money than GTX 1060 3 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	2560
Core clock speed	1506 MHz	2150 MHz
Boost clock speed	1708 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	123.0	416.0
Floating-point performance	3,935 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	250 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	8008 MHz	18000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.2 GB/s	432.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 3 GB 24.82

RX 6750 XT 53.79
+117%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB by 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1060 3 GB 9588

RX 6750 XT 20776
+117%

Radeon RX 6750 XT outperforms GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB by 117% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	70−75 −126%	158 +126%
1440p	40−45 −120%	88 +120%
4K	21−24 −148%	52 +148%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

75−80
−120%

165

+120%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −123%	85−90 +123%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −133%	90−95 +133%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −128%	170−180 +128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −131%	100−110 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	55−60 −131%	127 +131%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −133%	100−110 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −136%	130−140 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −128%	180−190 +128%
Hitman 3	45−50 −138%	100−110 +138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −121%	376 +121%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −120%	130−140 +120%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −128%	110−120 +128%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	160−170 −130%	368 +130%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60−65 −125%	135 +125%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −123%	85−90 +123%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −133%	90−95 +133%
Battlefield 5	75−80 −128%	170−180 +128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −131%	100−110 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 −118%	109 +118%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −133%	100−110 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −136%	130−140 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −128%	180−190 +128%
Hitman 3	45−50 −138%	100−110 +138%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−105 −124%	220−230 +124%
Metro Exodus	30−33 −140%	72 +140%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −128%	110−120 +128%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	140−150 −117%	304 +117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 −123%	245 +123%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 −134%	110−120 +134%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −123%	85−90 +123%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40−45 −133%	90−95 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 −131%	100−110 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	45−50 −118%	98 +118%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −133%	100−110 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 −128%	180−190 +128%
Horizon Zero Dawn	95−100 −121%	210 +121%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	110−120 −136%	260 +136%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −125%	135 +125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	45−50 −118%	98 +118%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

50−55
−128%

110−120

+128%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −124%	110−120 +124%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −127%	120−130 +127%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 −122%	60−65 +122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −133%	60−65 +133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −143%	85−90 +143%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −122%	60 +122%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −117%	141 +117%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −118%	120−130 +118%
Hitman 3	30−33 −150%	75−80 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 −126%	158 +126%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −129%	126 +129%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −119%	186 +119%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 −120%	85−90 +120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −143%	73 +143%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−130%

90−95
+130%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −119%	55−60 +119%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −133%	45−50 +133%
Hitman 3	18−20 −150%	45−50 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −150%	75−80 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −122%	60 +122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −126%	79 +126%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −138%	35−40 +138%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −131%	35−40 +131%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −160%	26 +160%
Far Cry 5	16−18 −119%	35−40 +119%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −129%	80−85 +129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 −125%	90 +125%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −134%	82 +134%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −128%	41 +128%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−148%

50−55
+148%

This is how GTX 1060 3 GB and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6750 XT is 126% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 XT is 120% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 XT is 148% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	24.82	53.79
Recency	18 August 2016	3 March 2022
Cost	$199	$549
Maximum RAM amount	3 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	250 Watt