Radeon HD 7870 vs GeForce GTX 1050

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 and Radeon HD 7870, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.08
+8.9%

GTX 1050 outperforms HD 7870 by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking389407
Place by popularity20not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.383.00
Power efficiency12.034.74
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGP107Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)5 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 has 279% better value for money than HD 7870.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401280
Core clock speed1290 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt175 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate58.2080.00
Floating-point processing power1.862 TFLOPS2.56 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs4080

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm241 mm
Height4.38" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Recommended system power (PSU)300 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin
SLI-no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz1200 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s153.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
Eyefinity-+
HDMI++
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 13.08
+8.9%
HD 7870 12.01

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 5030
+8.9%
HD 7870 4620

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 8571
+38.4%
HD 7870 6194

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 32463
+52.1%
HD 7870 21348

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p90−95
+7.1%
84
−7.1%
Full HD42
−57.1%
66
+57.1%
1440p21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
4K23
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.60
+104%
5.29
−104%
1440p5.19
+274%
19.39
−274%
4K4.74
+251%
16.62
−251%
  • GTX 1050 has 104% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 has 274% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 has 251% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 11
−100%
21−24
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+13%
21−24
−13%
Elden Ring 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+10.3%
35−40
−10.3%
Counter-Strike 2 6
−267%
21−24
+267%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+13%
21−24
−13%
Forza Horizon 4 53
+10.4%
45−50
−10.4%
Metro Exodus 41
+24.2%
30−35
−24.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Valorant 39
−20.5%
45−50
+20.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 36
−8.3%
35−40
+8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+13%
21−24
−13%
Dota 2 77
+79.1%
40−45
−79.1%
Elden Ring 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Far Cry 5 56
+19.1%
45−50
−19.1%
Fortnite 70−75
+7.2%
65−70
−7.2%
Forza Horizon 4 35
−37.1%
45−50
+37.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 53
+23.3%
40−45
−23.3%
Metro Exodus 26
−26.9%
30−35
+26.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9
−244%
30−35
+244%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+11.1%
35−40
−11.1%
Valorant 50−55
+8.5%
45−50
−8.5%
World of Tanks 250
+50.6%
160−170
−50.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
−34.5%
35−40
+34.5%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+4.5%
21−24
−4.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+13%
21−24
−13%
Dota 2 112
+160%
40−45
−160%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+6.4%
45−50
−6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 31
−54.8%
45−50
+54.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+7.8%
90−95
−7.8%
Valorant 28
−67.9%
45−50
+67.9%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 7
−129%
16−18
+129%
Elden Ring 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
−143%
16−18
+143%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+36.2%
65−70
−36.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
World of Tanks 90−95
+8.2%
85−90
−8.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 4 18
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
Metro Exodus 25
+0%
24−27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 30−35
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Dota 2 24
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Elden Ring 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24
+9.1%
21−24
−9.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 47
+114%
21−24
−114%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Fortnite 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 11
−45.5%
16−18
+45.5%
Valorant 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

This is how GTX 1050 and HD 7870 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 is 7% faster in 900p
  • HD 7870 is 57% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 is 17% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 is 160% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the HD 7870 is 267% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 is ahead in 45 tests (71%)
  • HD 7870 is ahead in 14 tests (22%)
  • there's a draw in 4 tests (6%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.08 12.01
Recency 25 October 2016 5 March 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 175 Watt

GTX 1050 has a 8.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1050 and Radeon HD 7870.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce GTX 1050
AMD Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7870

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 5948 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 644 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7870 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.