GeForce GTX 590 vs GTX 1050 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile with GeForce GTX 590, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Mobile
2017
4000 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
11.63
+34.3%

GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms GTX 590 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking409493
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.74
Power efficiency10.731.64
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP107BGF110
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)24 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6401024
Core clock speed1354 MHz607 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt365 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °C97 °C
Texture fill rate59.7238.91
Floating-point processing power1.911 TFLOPS1.244 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs4064

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.016x PCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Heightno data4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4000 MB3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
Memory bus width128 Bit768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed7008 MHz1707 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s327.7 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVIThree Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort
Multi monitor support++
HDMI-+
HDCP2.2-
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.2
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Mobile 11.63
+34.3%
GTX 590 8.66

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Mobile 7693
GTX 590 9167
+19.2%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Mobile 26560
+3.3%
GTX 590 25720

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Mobile 6068
GTX 590 6680
+10.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
+55.3%
47
−55.3%
Full HD46
−141%
111
+141%
1200p150−160
+33.9%
112
−33.9%
1440p24
+50%
16−18
−50%
4K15
+50%
10−12
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.30
1440pno data43.69
4Kno data69.90

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
Battlefield 5 51
+96.2%
24−27
−96.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
+122%
18−20
−122%
Far Cry 5 39
+95%
20−22
−95%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−5.5%
55−60
+5.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Battlefield 5 44
+69.2%
24−27
−69.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 36
+80%
20−22
−80%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−11.5%
55−60
+11.5%
Metro Exodus 19
−36.8%
24−27
+36.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−71.4%
24−27
+71.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+62.5%
24−27
−62.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
−16.7%
21−24
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 37
+37%
27−30
−37%
Far Cry 5 33
+65%
20−22
−65%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−56.8%
55−60
+56.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
Metro Exodus 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Battlefield 5 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−38.5%
35−40
+38.5%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
Metro Exodus 7
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
+60%
5−6
−60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
+40%
5−6
−40%
Battlefield 5 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 11
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+50%
10−11
−50%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and GTX 590 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 55% faster in 900p
  • GTX 590 is 141% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 34% faster in 1200p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 50% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 50% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1050 Mobile is 122% faster.
  • in Red Dead Redemption 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 590 is 71% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is ahead in 21 test (29%)
  • GTX 590 is ahead in 8 tests (11%)
  • there's a draw in 43 tests (60%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.63 8.66
Recency 3 January 2017 24 March 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 365 Watt

GTX 1050 Mobile has a 34.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 30.2% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 386.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 590 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GTX 590 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590
GeForce GTX 590

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1207 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 49 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.