Radeon RX Vega M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	306	not rated
Place by popularity	7	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.16	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	N17P-G1	Vega
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	25 October 2016 (7 years ago)	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	no data
Current price	$207 (1.5x MSRP)	$972

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	512
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	1291 MHz	720 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	1190 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	4,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	66.82	38.08
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	1,219 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	IGP
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	no data
HDMI	+	no data
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12.0
Shader Model	6.4	5.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	no data
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	25 October 2016	1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	System Shared
Chip lithography	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	15 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---