GeForce GTX 765M SLI vs GTX 1050 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with GeForce GTX 765M SLI, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.44
+53.8%

GTX 1050 Ti outperforms GTX 765M SLI by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking332431
Place by popularity7not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.10no data
Power efficiency15.095.66
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP107no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)30 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681536
Core clock speed1291 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million2x 2540 Million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt130 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.82no data
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2x 2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit2x 128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.44
+53.8%
GTX 765M SLI 10.69

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti 9453
+19%
GTX 765M SLI 7944

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti 7485
+47.5%
GTX 765M SLI 5073

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Ti 50939
+44%
GTX 765M SLI 35376

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD49
−40.8%
69
+40.8%
1440p30
+66.7%
18−20
−66.7%
4K26
+62.5%
16−18
−62.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.84no data
1440p4.63no data
4K5.35no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+45%
20−22
−45%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Elden Ring 50−55
+64.5%
30−35
−64.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+45%
20−22
−45%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Forza Horizon 4 67
+55.8%
40−45
−55.8%
Metro Exodus 48
+65.5%
27−30
−65.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+39.3%
27−30
−39.3%
Valorant 63
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+45%
20−22
−45%
Cyberpunk 2077 9
−133%
21−24
+133%
Dota 2 90
+137%
35−40
−137%
Elden Ring 50−55
+64.5%
30−35
−64.5%
Far Cry 5 77
+79.1%
40−45
−79.1%
Fortnite 90−95
+45.2%
60−65
−45.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+16.3%
40−45
−16.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+68.4%
35−40
−68.4%
Metro Exodus 32
+10.3%
27−30
−10.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
−215%
80−85
+215%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18
−55.6%
27−30
+55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−60%
30−35
+60%
Valorant 34
−17.6%
40−45
+17.6%
World of Tanks 200−210
+4.6%
197
−4.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+45%
20−22
−45%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Dota 2 125
+229%
35−40
−229%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+37.2%
40−45
−37.2%
Forza Horizon 4 43
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+41.5%
80−85
−41.5%
Valorant 53
+32.5%
40−45
−32.5%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 29
+107%
14−16
−107%
Elden Ring 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 29
+107%
14−16
−107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+206%
50−55
−206%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+66.7%
9−10
−66.7%
World of Tanks 110−120
+50%
75−80
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Metro Exodus 29
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Valorant 39
+50%
24−27
−50%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Dota 2 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Elden Ring 10−12
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 31
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Dota 2 63
+200%
21−24
−200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+61.5%
12−14
−61.5%
Fortnite 18−20
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Forza Horizon 4 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Valorant 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and GTX 765M SLI compete in popular games:

  • GTX 765M SLI is 41% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 67% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 63% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti is 229% faster.
  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 765M SLI is 215% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is ahead in 55 tests (87%)
  • GTX 765M SLI is ahead in 6 tests (10%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.44 10.69
Recency 25 October 2016 30 May 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 130 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has a 53.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 73.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 765M SLI is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce GTX 765M SLI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 207396 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.