Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile with Radeon AI PRO R9700, including specs and performance data.
AI PRO R9700 outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by a whopping 413% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 394 | 18 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 14.09 | 18.08 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | GP107 | Navi 48 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 3 January 2017 (8 years ago) | 23 July 2025 (recently) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 768 | 4096 |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1660 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 2920 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 3,300 million | 53,900 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 | 747.5 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.488 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 128 |
| TMUs | 48 | 256 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 128 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 64 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 2518 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | 644.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
| Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1a |
| HDMI | - | + |
| G-SYNC support | + | - |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Ansel | + | - |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | - |
| DLSS | - | + |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 56
−400%
| 280−290
+400%
|
| 1440p | 25
−380%
| 120−130
+380%
|
| 4K | 17
−400%
| 85−90
+400%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 59
−408%
|
300−310
+408%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 47
−411%
|
240−250
+411%
|
| Fortnite | 80−85
−400%
|
400−450
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 62
−384%
|
300−310
+384%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 56
−400%
|
280−290
+400%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 49
−410%
|
250−260
+410%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 124
−384%
|
600−650
+384%
|
| Dota 2 | 92
−389%
|
450−500
+389%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 44
−400%
|
220−230
+400%
|
| Fortnite | 76
−361%
|
350−400
+361%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 57
−409%
|
290−300
+409%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 55
−409%
|
280−290
+409%
|
| Metro Exodus | 19
−400%
|
95−100
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 52
−400%
|
260−270
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 47
−411%
|
240−250
+411%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 42
−400%
|
210−220
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 86
−365%
|
400−450
+365%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 40
−400%
|
200−210
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 43
−412%
|
220−230
+412%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 39
−413%
|
200−210
+413%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 26
−400%
|
130−140
+400%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 54
−400%
|
270−280
+400%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 100−110
−376%
|
500−550
+376%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−400%
|
110−120
+400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 12
−400%
|
60−65
+400%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 29
−383%
|
140−150
+383%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 26
−400%
|
130−140
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 30−35
−400%
|
170−180
+400%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 32
−400%
|
160−170
+400%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 24−27
−400%
|
130−140
+400%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7
−400%
|
35−40
+400%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 17
−400%
|
85−90
+400%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 20−22
−400%
|
100−105
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 50−55
−410%
|
260−270
+410%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 12
−400%
|
60−65
+400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 24−27
−400%
|
120−130
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 14−16
−400%
|
70−75
+400%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9
−400%
|
45−50
+400%
|
This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and AI PRO R9700 compete in popular games:
- AI PRO R9700 is 400% faster in 1080p
- AI PRO R9700 is 380% faster in 1440p
- AI PRO R9700 is 400% faster in 4K
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.87 | 71.18 |
| Recency | 3 January 2017 | 23 July 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | 300 Watt |
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has 300% lower power consumption.
AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 413.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon AI PRO R9700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Radeon AI PRO R9700 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
