RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GT 520M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

GT 520M
2011
1536 MB DDR3
0.72

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 6472% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking112363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameN12P-GP/LVAD107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date5 January 2011 (13 years ago)12 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$59.99 $649
Current price$237 (4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores482816
CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed740 / 600 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2130 MHz
Number of transistors585 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate5.9 billion/sec187.4
Floating-point performance129.02 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 520M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 520M 0.72
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 47.32
+6472%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 6472% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 520M 280
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 18314
+6441%

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms GeForce GT 520M by 6441% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p7
−6329%
450−500
+6329%
Full HD12
−6150%
750−800
+6150%
1200p7
−6329%
450−500
+6329%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5733%
350−400
+5733%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−5733%
350−400
+5733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
Hitman 3 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−6150%
500−550
+6150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−6400%
260−270
+6400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Hitman 3 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−6329%
450−500
+6329%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−6233%
190−200
+6233%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−5900%
300−310
+5900%

This is how GT 520M and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 6329% faster than GT 520M in 900p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 6150% faster than GT 520M in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 6329% faster than GT 520M in 1200p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.72 47.32
Recency 5 January 2011 12 February 2024
Cost $59.99 $649
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 520M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 520M is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
GeForce GT 520M
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 382 votes

Rate GeForce GT 520M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.