Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in performance ranking | 1120 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Value for money | 0.01 | no data |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Gen. 8 (2015−2016) |
GPU code name | N12P-GP/LV | Braswell |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 5 January 2011 (13 years old) | 1 April 2016 (7 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | no data |
Current price | $237 (4x MSRP) | no data |
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 48 | 12 |
CUDA cores | 48 | no data |
Core clock speed | 740 / 600 MHz | 320 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 640 MHz |
Number of transistors | 585 million | no data |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 12 Watt | no data |
Texture fill rate | 5.9 billion/sec | no data |
Floating-point performance | 129.02 gflops | no data |
Size and compatibility
Information on GeForce GT 520M and HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | no data |
Supplementary power connectors | None | no data |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR3 | no data |
Maximum RAM amount | 1536 MB | no data |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 800 MHz | no data |
Memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | no data |
Shared memory | - | + |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Optimus | + | no data |
API support
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | no data |
OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
OpenCL | 1.1 | no data |
Vulkan | N/A | no data |
CUDA | + | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GeForce GT 520M outperforms HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) by 44% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.
Advantages and disadvantages
Recency | 5 January 2011 | 1 April 2016 |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | 14 nm |
We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 520M and HD Graphics 400 (Braswell). We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.