Quadro FX 1700 vs GeForce GT 440

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking848not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.07no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGF108G84
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)12 September 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $699
Current price$160 (2x MSRP)$272 (0.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9632
CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed810 MHz460 MHz
Number of transistors585 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt42 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate13.0 billion/sec7.360
Floating-point performance311.04 gflops58.88 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length5.7" (14.5 cm)168 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB512 MB
Standard memory config per GPU1 GB GDDR5 or 2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz (GDDR5) or 900 MHz (DDR3)800 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 (DDR3) – 51.2 (GDDR5)25.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGADual Link DVI2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.23.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 440 770
+381%
FX 1700 160

GeForce GT 440 outperforms Quadro FX 1700 by 381% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2011 12 September 2007
Cost $79 $699
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB GDDR5 or 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 42 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 440 and Quadro FX 1700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 440 is a desktop card while Quadro FX 1700 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
GeForce GT 440
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Quadro FX 1700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1857 votes

Rate GeForce GT 440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.