Radeon RX 6500 XT vs GeForce GT 430

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 430 and Radeon RX 6500 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 430
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 49 Watt
1.36

6500 XT outperforms GT 430 by a whopping 1496% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1026270
Place by popularitynot in top-10078
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0547.95
Power efficiency2.2416.39
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGF108Navi 24
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date11 October 2010 (15 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6500 XT has 95800% better value for money than GT 430.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
CUDA cores per GPU96no data
Core clock speed700 MHz2610 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2815 MHz
Number of transistors585 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt107 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate11.20180.2
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPS5.765 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs1664
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L0 Cacheno data256 KB
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB
L2 Cache128 KB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length145 mmno data
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)2248 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 - 28.8 GB/s143.9 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.24.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 430 1.36
RX 6500 XT 21.71
+1496%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 430 603
Samples: 3048
RX 6500 XT 9598
+1492%
Samples: 2509

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 430 720
RX 6500 XT 15712
+2082%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−2000%
63
+2000%
1440p1−2
−3000%
31
+3000%
4K1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.33
−734%
3.16
+734%
1440p79.00
−1131%
6.42
+1131%
4K79.00
−575%
11.71
+575%
  • RX 6500 XT has 734% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT has 1131% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6500 XT has 575% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 0−1 281
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2300%
72
+2300%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1233%
80
+1233%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 194
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1700%
54
+1700%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−3300%
102
+3300%
Fortnite 5−6
−2220%
110−120
+2220%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−5250%
107
+5250%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−900%
60
+900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−810%
90−95
+810%
Valorant 35−40
−366%
160−170
+366%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 82
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−694%
250−260
+694%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1033%
34
+1033%
Dota 2 18−20
−706%
145
+706%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2967%
92
+2967%
Fortnite 5−6
−2220%
110−120
+2220%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−3950%
81
+3950%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
−8500%
86
+8500%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−700%
48
+700%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−2500%
52
+2500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−810%
90−95
+810%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−1214%
92
+1214%
Valorant 35−40
−366%
160−170
+366%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 2−3
−4550%
90−95
+4550%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30
+900%
Dota 2 18−20
−511%
110
+511%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−2767%
86
+2767%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−933%
90−95
+933%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−450%
33
+450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−810%
90−95
+810%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−671%
54
+671%
Valorant 35−40
−366%
160−170
+366%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−2220%
110−120
+2220%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−775%
35
+775%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−1560%
160−170
+1560%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−1143%
170−180
+1143%
Valorant 7−8
−2757%
200−210
+2757%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1600%
17
+1600%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2750%
57
+2750%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1400%
60−65
+1400%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−2200%
23
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1800%
35−40
+1800%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2700%
55−60
+2700%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−127%
34
+127%
Valorant 7−8
−1857%
130−140
+1857%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
−3250%
67
+3250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 18
+0%
18
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 7
+0%
7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 11
+0%
11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+0%
28
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4
+0%
4
+0%
Far Cry 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 9
+0%
9
+0%

This is how GT 430 and RX 6500 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6500 XT is 2000% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6500 XT is 3000% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6500 XT is 1600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6500 XT is 8500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6500 XT performs better in 50 tests (79%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 21.71
Recency 11 October 2010 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 107 Watt

GT 430 has 118.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6500 XT, on the other hand, has a 1496.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 430 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GeForce GT 430
AMD Radeon RX 6500 XT
Radeon RX 6500 XT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1289 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 3749 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 430 or Radeon RX 6500 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.