RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce GT 415M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 415M with RTX 6000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GT 415M
2010
512 MB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.64

RTX 6000 Ada Generation outperforms GT 415M by a whopping 9947% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking117719
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data8.47
Power efficiency4.2216.96
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF108AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)3 December 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$6,799

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4818176
Core clock speed500 MHz915 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors585 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0001,423
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS91.06 TFLOPS
ROPs4192
TMUs8568
Tensor Coresno data568
Ray Tracing Coresno data142

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 415M 0.64
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 64.30
+9947%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 415M 286
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 28728
+9945%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GT 415M 379
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 70850
+18594%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GT 415M 751
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 315509
+41912%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−18200%
183
+18200%
1440p1−2
−15900%
160
+15900%
4K1−2
−10800%
109
+10800%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data37.15
1440pno data42.49
4Kno data62.38

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8650%
170−180
+8650%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8650%
170−180
+8650%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6825%
270−280
+6825%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2113%
170−180
+2113%
Valorant 27−30
−1283%
400−450
+1283%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−1290%
270−280
+1290%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8650%
170−180
+8650%
Dota 2 12−14
−9900%
1200−1250
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6825%
270−280
+6825%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−11300%
114
+11300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2113%
170−180
+2113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−8050%
489
+8050%
Valorant 27−30
−1283%
400−450
+1283%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−8650%
170−180
+8650%
Dota 2 12−14
−9900%
1200−1250
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−6825%
270−280
+6825%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
−3900%
160−170
+3900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2113%
170−180
+2113%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4233%
260
+4233%
Valorant 27−30
−1283%
400−450
+1283%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−17100%
500−550
+17100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2400%
170−180
+2400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 100−110
Far Cry 5 4−5
−2850%
118
+2850%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−12000%
240−250
+12000%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−9400%
95−100
+9400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−10850%
219
+10850%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−15000%
150−160
+15000%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1020%
160−170
+1020%
Valorant 4−5
−8175%
300−350
+8175%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−3733%
115
+3733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 130
+0%
130
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 126
+0%
126
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Far Cry 5 118
+0%
118
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Metro Exodus 95
+0%
95
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40
+0%
40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 90
+0%
90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 184
+0%
184
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

This is how GT 415M and RTX 6000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 18200% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 15900% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 10800% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation is 17100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 Ada Generation is ahead in 33 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 64.30
Recency 3 September 2010 3 December 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 300 Watt

GT 415M has 2400% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 9946.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 9500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 415M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 415M is a notebook card while RTX 6000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
GeForce GT 415M
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Generation
RTX 6000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 415M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 105 votes

Rate RTX 6000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 415M or RTX 6000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.