GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Mobility Radeon HD 5470 and GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

ATI Mobility HD 5470
2010
512 MB GDDR5, 15 Watt
0.53

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile outperforms ATI Mobility HD 5470 by a whopping 3987% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1214227
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.7928.52
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameParkGN20-P0-R 6 GB
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)6 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores802560
Core clock speed750 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1492 MHz
Number of transistors292 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate6.000no data
Floating-point processing power0.12 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12_2
Shader Model5.0no data
OpenGL4.4no data
OpenCL1.2no data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−7000%
71
+7000%
1440p0−134

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3950%
81
+3950%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3100%
64
+3100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2250%
90−95
+2250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1050%
90−95
+1050%
Valorant 27−30
−482%
160−170
+482%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−3150%
65−70
+3150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
−1311%
250−260
+1311%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2200%
46
+2200%
Dota 2 12−14
−908%
120−130
+908%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2250%
90−95
+2250%
Metro Exodus 0−1 50−55
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1050%
90−95
+1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2175%
91
+2175%
Valorant 27−30
−482%
160−170
+482%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1850%
39
+1850%
Dota 2 12−14
−908%
120−130
+908%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2250%
90−95
+2250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1050%
90−95
+1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1150%
50
+1150%
Valorant 27−30
−482%
160−170
+482%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 2−3
−8250%
160−170
+8250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 6−7
−2800%
170−180
+2800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 21−24
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−6000%
60−65
+6000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−5500%
55−60
+5500%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 18−20
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−193%
40−45
+193%
Valorant 3−4
−4467%
130−140
+4467%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−2600%
27−30
+2600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1150%
24−27
+1150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 91
+0%
91
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Far Cry 5 71
+0%
71
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
+0%
40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how ATI Mobility HD 5470 and RTX 3050 6GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 7000% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is 8250% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is ahead in 30 tests (50%)
  • there's a draw in 30 tests (50%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.53 21.66
Recency 7 January 2010 6 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 60 Watt

ATI Mobility HD 5470 has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 3986.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobility Radeon HD 5470 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Mobility Radeon HD 5470
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 254 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5470 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 758 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon HD 5470 or GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.