GeForce RTX 2060 vs GT 335M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 335M with GeForce RTX 2060, including specs and performance data.

GT 335M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 28 Watt
0.83

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 335M by a whopping 3745% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1171166
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.12
Power efficiency2.3916.05
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT215TU106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)7 January 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores721920
Core clock speed450 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors727 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80201.6
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS6.451 TFLOPS
Gigaflops233no data
ROPs848
TMUs24120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30
L1 Cacheno data1.9 MB
L2 Cache64 KB3 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 335M 0.83
RTX 2060 31.91
+3745%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 335M Samples: 324 369
RTX 2060 Samples: 26930 14109
+3724%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 335M 3106
RTX 2060 60454
+1846%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−650%
120
+650%
1440p1−2
−7500%
76
+7500%
4K1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.91
1440pno data4.59
4Kno data6.98

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1183%
75−80
+1183%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−10200%
103
+10200%
Fortnite 0−1 179
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2233%
140
+2233%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1183%
75−80
+1183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1988%
167
+1988%
Valorant 30−35
−700%
248
+700%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1104%
270−280
+1104%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%
Dota 2 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−9800%
99
+9800%
Fortnite 0−1 155
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−2083%
131
+2083%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1183%
75−80
+1183%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−6600%
67
+6600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1888%
159
+1888%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2167%
136
+2167%
Valorant 30−35
−697%
247
+697%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%
Dota 2 14−16
−900%
140−150
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−9300%
94
+9300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1650%
105
+1650%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1183%
75−80
+1183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1425%
122
+1425%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1117%
73
+1117%
Valorant 30−35
−423%
162
+423%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 141

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2633%
80−85
+2633%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−4660%
230−240
+4660%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 35−40
Far Cry 5 0−1 80−85
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3033%
90−95
+3033%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−3800%
35−40
+3800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−8700%
85−90
+8700%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−347%
67
+347%
Valorant 5−6
−4060%
208
+4060%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2100%
44
+2100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1800%
38
+1800%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 42
+0%
42
+0%
Valorant 241
+0%
241
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+0%
59
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how GT 335M and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 650% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 7500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 is 4900% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 is 10200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 performs better in 37 tests (61%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (39%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.83 31.91
Recency 7 January 2010 7 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 160 Watt

GT 335M has 471.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060, on the other hand, has a 3744.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 335M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 335M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
GeForce GT 335M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 27 votes

Rate GeForce GT 335M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 11762 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 335M or GeForce RTX 2060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.