Radeon RX 6800 vs GeForce GT 335M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 335M with Radeon RX 6800, including specs and performance data.

GT 335M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 28 Watt
0.83

RX 6800 outperforms GT 335M by a whopping 5910% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking117163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.86
Power efficiency2.3916.06
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGT215Navi 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$579

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores723840
Core clock speed450 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2105 MHz
Number of transistors727 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80505.2
Floating-point processing power0.1555 TFLOPS16.17 TFLOPS
Gigaflops233no data
ROPs896
TMUs24240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L0 Cacheno data960 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache64 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsSingle Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMIDual Link DVI1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 335M 0.83
RX 6800 49.88
+5910%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 335M Samples: 324 369
RX 6800 Samples: 3839 22057
+5878%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 335M 3106
RX 6800 106236
+3320%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−988%
174
+988%
1440p1−2
−10100%
102
+10100%
4K1−2
−6100%
62
+6100%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.33
1440pno data5.68
4Kno data9.34

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−6650%
135
+6650%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−3367%
208
+3367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5650%
115
+5650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−19600%
197
+19600%
Fortnite 0−1 230−240
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−3317%
200−210
+3317%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−2683%
167
+2683%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%
Valorant 30−35
−839%
290−300
+839%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1109%
270−280
+1109%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−5100%
104
+5100%
Dota 2 14−16
−936%
145
+936%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−18500%
186
+18500%
Fortnite 0−1 230−240
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−3317%
200−210
+3317%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−2067%
130
+2067%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−14600%
147
+14600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−4383%
269
+4383%
Valorant 30−35
−839%
290−300
+839%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−4850%
99
+4850%
Dota 2 14−16
−814%
128
+814%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−17300%
174
+17300%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−3317%
200−210
+3317%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−1500%
96
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−2088%
170−180
+2088%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2433%
152
+2433%
Valorant 30−35
−839%
290−300
+839%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 230−240

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−5733%
175
+5733%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−7620%
350−400
+7620%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1844%
170−180
+1844%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 74
Far Cry 5 0−1 163
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−5467%
160−170
+5467%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−7200%
73
+7200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−11400%
110−120
+11400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−14800%
140−150
+14800%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−780%
132
+780%
Valorant 5−6
−6000%
300−350
+6000%

4K
Ultra Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 350
+0%
350
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 349
+0%
349
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 232
+0%
232
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 259
+0%
259
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 210
+0%
210
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 159
+0%
159
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 125
+0%
125
+0%
Metro Exodus 89
+0%
89
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 47
+0%
47
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 99
+0%
99
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
+0%
35
+0%

This is how GT 335M and RX 6800 compete in popular games:

  • RX 6800 is 988% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6800 is 10100% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6800 is 6100% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX 6800 is 19600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RX 6800 performs better in 37 tests (61%)
  • there's a draw in 24 tests (39%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.83 49.88
Recency 7 January 2010 28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 250 Watt

GT 335M has 792.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6800, on the other hand, has a 5909.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6800 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 335M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 335M is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 6800 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 335M
GeForce GT 335M
AMD Radeon RX 6800
Radeon RX 6800

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 27 votes

Rate GeForce GT 335M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2237 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 335M or Radeon RX 6800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.