GeForce RTX 2060 vs GT 330M

Place in performance ranking	1172	122
Place by popularity	not in top-100	23
Value for money	no data	21.02
Architecture	GT2xx (2009−2012)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N11P-GE1	Turing TU106
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	10 January 2010 (14 years old)	6 January 2019 (5 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$349
Current price	$448	$397 (1.1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 330M and RTX 2060 have a nearly equal value for money.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	1920
CUDA cores	48	no data
Core clock speed	575 MHz	1320 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1620 MHz
Number of transistors	486 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	175 Watt
Texture fill rate	9.200	201.6
Floating-point performance	121.44 gflops	no data
Gigaflops	182	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 330M and GeForce RTX 2060 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	229 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin
SLI options	+	no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR2, GDDR3, DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	Up to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	HDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	no data	+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management	8.0	no data
VR Ready	no data	+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12
Shader Model	4.1	6.5
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 330M 0.55

RTX 2060 36.53
+6542%

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 330M by 6542% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 330M 214

RTX 2060 14149
+6512%

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 330M by 6512% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 330M 2658

RTX 2060 60454
+2175%

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 330M by 2175% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	10 −6400%	650−700 +6400%
Full HD	17 −612%	121 +612%
1440p	1−2 −7500%	76 +7500%
4K	0−1	50

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−2033%

60−65
+2033%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −1588%	135 +1588%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2033%	60−65 +2033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −5000%	102 +5000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1683%	107 +1683%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −1375%	118 +1375%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2033%	60−65 +2033%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −6600%	67 +6600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −2700%	56 +2700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −1500%	96 +1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −4433%	136 +4433%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −2033%	60−65 +2033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −2333%	73 +2333%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3700%	76 +3700%
Hitman 3	3−4 −2133%	65−70 +2133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −550%	52 +550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1250%	50−55 +1250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2700%	27−30 +2700%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −6500%	65−70 +6500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −5000%	50−55 +5000%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −4200%	43 +4200%
Hitman 3	1−2 −3500%	35−40 +3500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −114%	15 +114%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5	3−4 −1267%	41 +1267%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −740%	42 +740%

This is how GT 330M and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:

900p resolution:

RTX 2060 is 6400% faster than GT 330M

1080p resolution:

RTX 2060 is 612% faster than GT 330M

1440p resolution:

RTX 2060 is 7500% faster than GT 330M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 is 6600% faster than the GT 330M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 2060 surpassed GT 330M in all 25 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance score	0.55	36.53
Recency	10 January 2010	6 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	175 Watt