GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs GT 320M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 320M and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 320M
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.27

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms GT 320M by a whopping 6674% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1357305
Place by popularitynot in top-10029
Power efficiency1.3328.55
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG96CGA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speed500 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00094.53
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 320M 0.27
RTX 2050 Mobile 18.29
+6674%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 320M 1205
RTX 2050 Mobile 46821
+3786%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−141
1440p0−134
4K-0−126

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−4500%
45−50
+4500%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−414%
36
+414%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4600%
47
+4600%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−4800%
49
+4800%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−329%
30
+329%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4100%
42
+4100%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2300%
70−75
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−843%
65−70
+843%
Valorant 24−27
−419%
130−140
+419%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−2900%
30
+2900%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−286%
27
+286%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−1733%
220−230
+1733%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2800%
29
+2800%
Dota 2 9−10
−1211%
118
+1211%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2300%
70−75
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−843%
65−70
+843%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1350%
58
+1350%
Valorant 24−27
−419%
130−140
+419%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−357%
30−35
+357%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2400%
25
+2400%
Dota 2 9−10
−1122%
110
+1122%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−2300%
70−75
+2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−843%
65−70
+843%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−725%
33
+725%
Valorant 24−27
−419%
130−140
+419%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−16600%
160−170
+16600%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−4300%
40−45
+4300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2700%
27−30
+2700%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 40−45

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 14−16
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
Valorant 2−3
−4800%
95−100
+4800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−1700%
18
+1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 49
+0%
49
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 68
+0%
68
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 33
+0%
33
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Dota 2 34
+0%
34
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 16600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 33 tests (51%)
  • there's a draw in 32 tests (49%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 18.29
Recency 15 June 2009 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 45 Watt

GT 320M has 221.4% lower power consumption.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 6674.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 320M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 132 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2438 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 320M or GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.