GeForce Go 7900 GS vs GT 240

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking985not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.01no data
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)G7x (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGT215G71M
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 November 2009 (14 years ago)18 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80 no data
Current price$708 (8.9x MSRP)no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9627
CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed550 MHz7 MHz
Boost clock speedno data375 MHz
Number of transistors727 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)69 Watt20 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105C Cno data
Texture fill rate17.607.500
Floating-point performance257.28 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GT 240 and GeForce Go 7900 GS compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-II
Length6.6" (168mm) (16.8 cm)no data
Height4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB or 1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1700 MHz GDDR5, 1000 MHz GDDR3, 900 MHz DDR3 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth54.4 GB/s32 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVIVGAHDMINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.13.0
OpenGL3.22.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 240 510
+190%
Go 7900 GS 176

GT 240 outperforms Go 7900 GS by 190% in Passmark.

Advantages and disadvantages


Recency 17 November 2009 18 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB or 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 69 Watt 20 Watt

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 240 and GeForce Go 7900 GS. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 240 is a desktop card while GeForce Go 7900 GS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 240
GeForce GT 240
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GS
GeForce Go 7900 GS

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 755 votes

Rate GeForce GT 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.