T600 vs GeForce Go 7900 GS

Place in the ranking	1237	321
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.60	29.21
Architecture	Curie (2003−2013)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G71	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	18 April 2006 (18 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	27	640
Core clock speed	375 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	375 MHz	1335 MHz
Number of transistors	278 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.500	53.40
Floating-point processing power	no data	1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	20	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	500 MHz	1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	9.0c (9_3)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	3.0	6.6
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	-	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7900 GS 0.46

T600 16.76
+3543%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7900 GS 176

T600 6465
+3573%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −5100%	52 +5100%
1440p	0−1	24
4K	0−1	21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−1200%

24−27
+1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1167%	35−40 +1167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1600%	30−35 +1600%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Hitman 3	4−5 −700%	30−35 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −938%	80−85 +938%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1275%	55−60 +1275%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −196%	80−85 +196%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1167%	35−40 +1167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1600%	30−35 +1600%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Hitman 3	4−5 −700%	30−35 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −938%	80−85 +938%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1175%	51 +1175%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −333%	35−40 +333%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −196%	80−85 +196%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1167%	35−40 +1167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1600%	30−35 +1600%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1200%	24−27 +1200%
Hitman 3	4−5 −700%	30−35 +700%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −388%	39 +388%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −1025%	45 +1025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −200%	27 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −196%	80−85 +196%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	9−10
Hitman 3	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −1250%	27 +1250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1300%

27−30
+1300%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	8−9

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−650%

14−16
+650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Battlefield 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

+0%

45−50

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	32 +0%	32 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Hitman 3	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16 +0%	16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 +0%	18 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%

This is how Go 7900 GS and T600 compete in popular games:

T600 is 5100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T600 is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

T600 is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.46	16.76
Recency	18 April 2006	6 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	90 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	20 Watt	40 Watt

Go 7900 GS has 100% lower power consumption.

T600, on the other hand, has a 3543.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The T600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7900 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce Go 7900 GS is a notebook card while T600 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.