GeForce RTX 2060 vs GT 230M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 230M with GeForce RTX 2060, including specs and performance data.

GT 230M
2009
Up to 1 GB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.55

RTX 2060 outperforms GT 230M by a whopping 6429% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1225134
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data39.05
Power efficiency1.6815.76
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGT216TU106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)7 January 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores481920
Core clock speed500 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1680 MHz
Number of transistors486 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000201.6
Floating-point processing power0.1056 TFLOPS6.451 TFLOPS
Gigaflops158no data
ROPs848
TMUs16120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 600 (DDR2), Up to 800 (GDDR3), Up to 1066 (GDDR3) MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth16 (DDR2), 25 (DDR3)336.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVIVGADisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+
Audio input for HDMIHDAno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data
VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 230M 0.55
RTX 2060 35.91
+6429%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 230M 215
RTX 2060 14130
+6472%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GT 230M 2363
RTX 2060 60454
+2458%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−12200%
123
+12200%
1440p1−2
−8100%
82
+8100%
4K0−152

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.84
1440pno data4.26
4Kno data6.71

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−4950%
100−110
+4950%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−4950%
100−110
+4950%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3400%
140
+3400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2286%
167
+2286%
Valorant 27−30
−786%
248
+786%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−4950%
100−110
+4950%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
−1529%
270−280
+1529%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%
Dota 2 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−3175%
131
+3175%
Metro Exodus 0−1 67
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−2171%
159
+2171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−3300%
136
+3300%
Valorant 27−30
−782%
247
+782%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%
Dota 2 10−12
−1173%
140−150
+1173%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−2525%
105
+2525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1643%
122
+1643%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−1725%
73
+1725%
Valorant 27−30
−479%
162
+479%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 1−2
−23300%
230−240
+23300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 35−40
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−9300%
90−95
+9300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
−8700%
85−90
+8700%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 27−30
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−347%
67
+347%
Valorant 3−4
−6833%
208
+6833%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−4000%
41
+4000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2100%
44
+2100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1800%
38
+1800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 145
+0%
145
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Fortnite 179
+0%
179
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 99
+0%
99
+0%
Fortnite 155
+0%
155
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 119
+0%
119
+0%
Far Cry 5 94
+0%
94
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 141
+0%
141
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 42
+0%
42
+0%
Valorant 241
+0%
241
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+0%
51
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how GT 230M and RTX 2060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 12200% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 8100% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2060 is 23300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is ahead in 35 tests (55%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.55 35.91
Recency 15 June 2009 7 January 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 160 Watt

GT 230M has 595.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060, on the other hand, has a 6429.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 230M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 230M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 230M
GeForce GT 230M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10872 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 230M or GeForce RTX 2060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.