GeForce RTX 4070 vs GT 220

Aggregated performance score

GT 220
2009
1GB GDDR3
0.56

RTX 4070 outperforms GT 220 by a whopping 12373% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking117317
Place by popularitynot in top-10026
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data26.48
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameGT216AD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date12 October 2009 (14 years ago)13 April 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 $599
Current price$121 (1.5x MSRP)$791 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 220 and RTX 4070 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores485888
CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed625 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors486 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt200 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate9.840455.4
Floating-point performance144 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length6.6" (16.8 cm)240 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.3 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsVGADVIHDMI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIF + HDAno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.7
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 220 0.56
RTX 4070 69.85
+12373%

RTX 4070 outperforms GT 220 by 12373% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GT 220 215
RTX 4070 27026
+12470%

RTX 4070 outperforms GT 220 by 12470% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−910%
212
+910%
1440p0−1120
4K0−172

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7100%
216
+7100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−2063%
170−180
+2063%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−5700%
174
+5700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5750%
110−120
+5750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4467%
274
+4467%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−2063%
170−180
+2063%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4667%
143
+4667%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−16700%
168
+16700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−5750%
110−120
+5750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4033%
248
+4033%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−11600%
351
+11600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−4167%
128
+4167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−5567%
170
+5567%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−6250%
120−130
+6250%
Hitman 3 3−4
−5067%
150−160
+5067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1363%
110−120
+1363%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−3950%
162
+3950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−8000%
81
+8000%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−17000%
171
+17000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−12800%
120−130
+12800%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−7700%
75−80
+7700%
Hitman 3 1−2
−8800%
85−90
+8800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1000%
75−80
+1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−3000%
93
+3000%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1820%
96
+1820%

This is how GT 220 and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is 910% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4070 is 17000% faster than the GT 220.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4070 surpassed GT 220 in all 25 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 69.85
Recency 12 October 2009 13 April 2023
Cost $79.99 $599
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 200 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 220 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
GeForce GT 220
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
GeForce RTX 4070

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 673 votes

Rate GeForce GT 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 7219 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.