Quadro FX 4000 vs GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1365 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 0.13 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013) | Curie (2003−2013) |
| GPU code name | GT218 | NV40 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Workstation |
| Release date | 24 August 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 April 2004 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $2,199 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 589 MHz | 375 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 260 million | 222 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 142 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 4.712 | 4.500 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.04486 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 4 | 8 |
| TMUs | 8 | 12 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
| Length | 168 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x Molex |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | 32 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 9.0c (9_3) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | N/A |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 1.2 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 August 2009 | 1 April 2004 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 31 Watt | 142 Watt |
G210 OEM Rev. 2 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 358.1% lower power consumption.
FX 4000, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 and Quadro FX 4000. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce G210 OEM Rev. 2 is a desktop card while Quadro FX 4000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
