GeForce GTS 260M vs FX Go5300

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1485not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameNV34 A1GT215
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date1 March 2003 (21 year ago)15 June 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed275 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors45 million727 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data38 Watt
Texture fill rate1.10017.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.264 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data396
ROPs48
TMUs432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x16
SLI options-+
MXM Typeno dataMXM 3.0 Type-B

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount64 MB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHzUp to 2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s57.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDMIVGADual Link DVIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a11.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)2.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2003 15 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 40 nm

GTS 260M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 275% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX Go5300 and GeForce GTS 260M. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5300
GeForce FX Go5300
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M
GeForce GTS 260M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate GeForce FX Go5300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate GeForce GTS 260M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.