Arc A370M vs GeForce FX 5900 Ultra

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated383
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.19
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameNV35DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date23 October 2003 (21 year ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1550 MHz
Number of transistors135 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)59 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60099.20
Floating-point processing powerno data3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs864
Ray Tracing Coresno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x8
Length218 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x Molexno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5900 Ultra 41
Arc A370M 5115
+12376%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 23 October 2003 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 59 Watt 35 Watt

Arc A370M has an age advantage of 18 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 68.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce FX 5900 Ultra and Arc A370M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce FX 5900 Ultra is a desktop card while Arc A370M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
GeForce FX 5900 Ultra
Intel Arc A370M
Arc A370M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 6 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5900 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 163 votes

Rate Arc A370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.