GeForce MX230 vs 9800M GTX SLI

Place in the ranking	764	642
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.50	34.86
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	NB9E-GTX	GP108
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 July 2008 (16 years ago)	21 February 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	224	256
Core clock speed	500 MHz	1519 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1582 MHz
Number of transistors	3016 Million	1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	10 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	25.31
Floating-point processing power	no data	0.81 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	16
TMUs	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	48.06 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.4
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	-	1.2.131
CUDA	+	+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

14−16

−64.3%

23
+64.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

6−7

−33.3%

8−9
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −44.4%	13 +44.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −280%	19 +280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −100%	14 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −133%	14 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −113%	17 +113%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −247%	59 +247%
Hitman 3	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −34.8%	30−35 +34.8%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −350%	18 +350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −76.9%	23 +76.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −77.8%	16 +77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Battlefield 5	5−6 −160%	13 +160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −85.7%	13 +85.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −100%	12 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −50%	12 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −212%	53 +212%
Hitman 3	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −34.8%	30−35 +34.8%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −225%	13 +225%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −62.5%	12−14 +62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +50%	6 −50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −28.6%	9 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −16.7%	7 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +41.7%	12 −41.7%
Hitman 3	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −34.8%	30−35 +34.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +55.6%	9 −55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −15.4%	45−50 +15.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9

−62.5%

12−14
+62.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Hitman 3	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −57.9%	30−33 +57.9%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−50%

9−10
+50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−25%

5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Metro Exodus	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

0−1

This is how 9800M GTX SLI and GeForce MX230 compete in popular games:

GeForce MX230 is 64% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9800M GTX SLI is 56% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX230 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

9800M GTX SLI is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
GeForce MX230 is ahead in 57 tests (84%)
there's a draw in 8 tests (12%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.07	4.75
Recency	15 July 2008	21 February 2019
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	65 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	10 Watt

GeForce MX230 has a 54.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX230 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.