GeForce MX570 vs 9800M GTS SLI

Place in the ranking	903	353
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.95	43.71
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	NB9E-GT	GA107
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	15 July 2008 (16 years ago)	May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	128	2048
Core clock speed	600 MHz	832 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1155 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	25 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	73.92
Floating-point processing power	no data	4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	40
TMUs	no data	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	96 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.6
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	8.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

4−5

−475%

21−24
+475%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −4700%	45−50 +4700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −475%	21−24 +475%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1100%	95−100 +1100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −300%	27−30 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −322%	75−80 +322%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −925%	40−45 +925%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −380%	45−50 +380%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −123%	75−80 +123%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −4700%	45−50 +4700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −475%	21−24 +475%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −720%	40−45 +720%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1100%	95−100 +1100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −300%	27−30 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −322%	75−80 +322%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −925%	40−45 +925%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −380%	45−50 +380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −123%	75−80 +123%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −386%	30−35 +386%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −500%	30−33 +500%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −475%	21−24 +475%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1067%	35−40 +1067%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 −1100%	95−100 +1100%
Hitman 3	7−8 −300%	27−30 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −322%	75−80 +322%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −380%	45−50 +380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −123%	75−80 +123%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−925%

40−45
+925%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −867%	27−30 +867%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −750%	16−18 +750%
Hitman 3	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−12 −727%	90−95 +727%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−380%

24−27
+380%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

1−2

−1000%

10−12
+1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	7−8
Far Cry 5	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	6−7

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−333%

12−14
+333%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Hitman 3	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	70−75 +0%	70−75 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 4700% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX570 is ahead in 53 tests (76%)
there's a draw in 17 tests (24%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.95	14.89
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	2 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	25 Watt

GeForce MX570 has a 663.6% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 500% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTS SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.