FirePro V3900 vs GeForce 9800 GX2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800 GX2 with FirePro V3900, including specs and performance data.

9800 GX2
2008, $599
512 MB GDDR3, 197 Watt
1.46

V3900 outperforms 9800 GX2 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10341022
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.03no data
Power efficiency0.572.33
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG92Turks
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 March 2008 (17 years ago)7 February 2012 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256 (128 per GPU) ×2480
Core clock speed600 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors754 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)197 Watt199 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate38.40 ×215.60
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS ×20.624 TFLOPS
ROPs16 ×28
TMUs64 ×224
L1 Cacheno data48 KB
L2 Cache64 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 2.1 x16
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mm168 mm
Height2-slotno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Form factorno datahalf height / half length
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB ×21 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth128 (64 per GPU) ×228 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIDual Link DVI1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
DisplayPort countno data1
Dual-link DVI support-+
HD сomponent video output-+
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL2.14.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9800 GX2 1.46
FirePro V3900 1.51
+3.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9800 GX2 612
Samples: 50
FirePro V3900 630
+2.9%
Samples: 170

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.46 1.51
Recency 18 March 2008 7 February 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 197 Watt 199 Watt

9800 GX2 has 1% lower power consumption.

FirePro V3900, on the other hand, has a 3.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce 9800 GX2 and FirePro V3900.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GX2 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro V3900 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
GeForce 9800 GX2
AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 11 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 100 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9800 GX2 or FirePro V3900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.