GeForce 8800 GS vs FirePro V3900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro V3900 with GeForce 8800 GS, including specs and performance data.

FirePro V3900
2012
1 GB GDDR3, 199 Watt
1.51
+91.1%

V3900 outperforms 8800 GS by an impressive 91% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10221208
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.330.58
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameTurksG92
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2012 (14 years ago)31 January 2008 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48096
Core clock speed650 MHz550 MHz
Number of transistors716 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)199 Watt105 Watt
Texture fill rate15.6026.40
Floating-point processing power0.624 TFLOPS0.264 TFLOPS
ROPs812
TMUs2448
L1 Cache48 KBno data
L2 Cache256 KB48 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 2.1 x16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm229 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Form factorhalf height / half lengthno data
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB384 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth28 GB/s38.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
DisplayPort count1no data
Dual-link DVI support+-
HD сomponent video output+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model5.04.0
OpenGL4.43.3
OpenCL1.21.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FirePro V3900 1.51
+91.1%
8800 GS 0.79

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro V3900 630
+90.9%
Samples: 170
8800 GS 330
Samples: 108

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.51 0.79
Recency 7 February 2012 31 January 2008
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 384 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 199 Watt 105 Watt

FirePro V3900 has a 91.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

8800 GS, on the other hand, has 89.5% lower power consumption.

The FirePro V3900 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V3900 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8800 GS is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V3900
FirePro V3900
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS
GeForce 8800 GS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 100 votes

Rate FirePro V3900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 59 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about FirePro V3900 or GeForce 8800 GS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.