GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs 9800 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9800 GT with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, including specs and performance data.

9800 GT
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 105 Watt
1.24

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 9800 GT by a whopping 1528% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1005257
Place by popularitynot in top-10080
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0218.35
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameG92N18P-G62
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date21 July 2008 (15 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data
Current price$154 (1x MSRP)$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 91650% better value for money than 9800 GT.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1121024
CUDA cores112no data
Core clock speed600 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors754 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate33.6 billion/sec95.04
Floating-point performance336.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 9800 GT and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length9" (22.9 cm)no data
Height1-slotno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth57.6 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDTVDual Link DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA+7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9800 GT 1.24
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.19
+1528%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 9800 GT by 1528% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

9800 GT 478
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+1531%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 9800 GT by 1531% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−1833%
58
+1833%
1440p2−3
−2250%
47
+2250%
4K1−2
−2200%
23
+2200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 59
−1510%
950−1000
+1510%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 61
−1457%
950−1000
+1457%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
−1431%
750−800
+1431%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−1491%
1050−1100
+1491%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 53
−1504%
850−900
+1504%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−1422%
700−750
+1422%
Far Cry 5 69
−1494%
1100−1150
+1494%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
−1507%
1350−1400
+1507%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−1493%
1450−1500
+1493%
Hitman 3 51
−1469%
800−850
+1469%
Horizon Zero Dawn 115
−1509%
1850−1900
+1509%
Metro Exodus 91
−1493%
1450−1500
+1493%
Red Dead Redemption 2 44
−1491%
700−750
+1491%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95
−1479%
1500−1550
+1479%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60
−1483%
950−1000
+1483%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 46
−1422%
700−750
+1422%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
−1463%
500−550
+1463%
Battlefield 5 65−70
−1491%
1050−1100
+1491%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 47
−1496%
750−800
+1496%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
−1428%
550−600
+1428%
Far Cry 5 58
−1452%
900−950
+1452%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
−1510%
950−1000
+1510%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−1493%
1450−1500
+1493%
Hitman 3 45
−1456%
700−750
+1456%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180
−1511%
2900−2950
+1511%
Metro Exodus 68
−1518%
1100−1150
+1518%
Red Dead Redemption 2 42
−1448%
650−700
+1448%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75
−1500%
1200−1250
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
−1497%
1150−1200
+1497%
Watch Dogs: Legion 183
−1512%
2950−3000
+1512%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27
−1381%
400−450
+1381%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
−1500%
240−250
+1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 31
−1513%
500−550
+1513%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−1518%
550−600
+1518%
Far Cry 5 39
−1438%
600−650
+1438%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
−1493%
1450−1500
+1493%
Horizon Zero Dawn 64
−1463%
1000−1050
+1463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
−1487%
1000−1050
+1487%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−1438%
600−650
+1438%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
−1491%
350−400
+1491%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 41
−1485%
650−700
+1485%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−1438%
600−650
+1438%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−1525%
650−700
+1525%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−1329%
300−310
+1329%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−1479%
300−310
+1479%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−1438%
400−450
+1438%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
−1525%
260−270
+1525%
Far Cry 5 30−35
−1518%
550−600
+1518%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−1438%
600−650
+1438%
Hitman 3 28
−1507%
450−500
+1507%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−1485%
650−700
+1485%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−1479%
600−650
+1479%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−1448%
650−700
+1448%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
−1422%
350−400
+1422%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−1471%
220−230
+1471%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−1415%
500−550
+1415%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Far Cry New Dawn 20
−1400%
300−310
+1400%
Hitman 3 16
−1525%
260−270
+1525%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1491%
350−400
+1491%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−1511%
290−300
+1511%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−1500%
400−450
+1500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−1483%
190−200
+1483%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−1500%
160−170
+1500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−1445%
170−180
+1445%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
−1483%
95−100
+1483%
Far Cry 5 12
−1483%
190−200
+1483%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
−1507%
450−500
+1507%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−1491%
350−400
+1491%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−1479%
300−310
+1479%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−1525%
130−140
+1525%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−1511%
290−300
+1511%

This is how 9800 GT and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 1833% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2250% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2200% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 20.19
Recency 21 July 2008 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 50 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9800 GT is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
GeForce 9800 GT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1368 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1472 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.