ATI GameCube GPU vs GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 5 (2000)
GPU code nameG92Flipper
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date21 July 2008 (16 years ago)24 August 2000 (24 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$160 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128no data
Core clock speed725 MHz162 MHz
Number of transistors754 million51 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm180 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate46.400.65
Floating-point performance0.448 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3SDR
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz162 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s1.296 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)6.0+
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 July 2008 24 August 2000
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 180 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 45 Watt

9800 GT Rebrand has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 176.9% more advanced lithography process.

ATI GameCube GPU, on the other hand, has 177.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand and GameCube GPU. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
ATI GameCube GPU
GameCube GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 24 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 31 vote

Rate GameCube GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.