GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs 9600M GT

Place in the ranking	1282	213
Place by popularity	not in top-100	66
Power efficiency	1.08	24.23
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code name	G96C	GA106
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	4 June 2008 (16 years ago)	11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	2560
Core clock speed	120 MHz	735 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1035 MHz
Number of transistors	314 million	13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.000	82.80
Floating-point processing power	0.08 TFLOPS	5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	16	80
Tensor Cores	no data	80
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	MXM-II	PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	25.6 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.0	6.6
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
CUDA	+	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

9600M GT 0.36

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 26.35
+7219%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9600M GT 139

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10127
+7186%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	1−2 −7300%	74 +7300%
1440p	0−1	42
4K	-0−1	28

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1967%	62 +1967%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1567%	50 +1567%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2033%	128 +2033%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −2350%	98 +2350%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1233%	40 +1233%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −971%	75 +971%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1650%	105 +1650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2214%	160−170 +2214%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −875%	39 +875%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1620%	85−90 +1620%
World of Tanks	12−14 −1923%	260−270 +1923%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −717%	45−50 +717%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1067%	35 +1067%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −1029%	75−80 +1029%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −1400%	90 +1400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 −2214%	160−170 +2214%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

2−3

−8650%

170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −600%	21 +600%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −1850%	75−80 +1850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Valorant	5−6 −1520%	81 +1520%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 −193%	44 +193%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −193%	44 +193%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 −8000%	80−85 +8000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −193%	44 +193%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	27−30
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10 +400%
Dota 2	14−16 −260%	54 +260%
Valorant	1−2 −3400%	35−40 +3400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	87 +0%	87 +0%
Metro Exodus	84 +0%	84 +0%
Valorant	121 +0%	121 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Dota 2	102 +0%	102 +0%
Fortnite	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	58 +0%	58 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	94 +0%	94 +0%
Metro Exodus	62 +0%	62 +0%
Valorant	79 +0%	79 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Dota 2	113 +0%	113 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	57 +0%	57 +0%
Valorant	112 +0%	112 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	41 +0%	41 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	41 +0%	41 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
World of Tanks	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	61 +0%	61 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Metro Exodus	60 +0%	60 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	21 +0%	21 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Fortnite	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	34 +0%	34 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

This is how 9600M GT and RTX 3050 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 7300% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 8650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 31 test (49%)
there's a draw in 32 tests (51%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.36	26.35
Recency	4 June 2008	11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	4 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	23 Watt	75 Watt

9600M GT has 226.1% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 7219.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9600M GT in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.