GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile vs GT 320M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 320M and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GT 320M
2009
512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.23

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile outperforms GT 320M by a whopping 9752% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1359221
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Power efficiency1.3023.87
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG96CGA106
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 June 2009 (15 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322560
Core clock speed500 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1035 MHz
Number of transistors314 million13,250 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00082.80
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS5.299 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1680
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA1.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 320M 0.23
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 22.66
+9752%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 320M 105
RTX 3050 Ti Mobile 10127
+9545%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−174
1440p-0−142
4K-0−126

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−9300%
94
+9300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−6100%
62
+6100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−7000%
71
+7000%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−5800%
59
+5800%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3167%
95−100
+3167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1271%
95−100
+1271%
Valorant 24−27
−546%
160−170
+546%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
−4100%
42
+4100%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2058%
250−260
+2058%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−4400%
45
+4400%
Dota 2 9−10
−1211%
118
+1211%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3167%
95−100
+3167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1271%
95−100
+1271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−2967%
92
+2967%
Valorant 24−27
−546%
160−170
+546%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
Dota 2 9−10
−1156%
113
+1156%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3167%
95−100
+3167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1271%
95−100
+1271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1567%
50
+1567%
Valorant 24−27
−331%
112
+331%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−8650%
170−180
+8650%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 22
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−6300%
60−65
+6300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 55−60

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−193%
44
+193%
Valorant 2−3
−7150%
140−150
+7150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 1−2
−2000%
21
+2000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1200%
24−27
+1200%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−1250%
27−30
+1250%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 79
+0%
79
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+0%
94
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 98
+0%
98
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Far Cry 5 74
+0%
74
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 84
+0%
84
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+0%
94
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 41
+0%
41
+0%
Metro Exodus 34
+0%
34
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Far Cry 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 21
+0%
21
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 38
+0%
38
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Atomic Heart, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is 9300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is ahead in 28 tests (46%)
  • there's a draw in 33 tests (54%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 22.66
Recency 15 June 2009 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 75 Watt

GT 320M has 435.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, on the other hand, has a 9752.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 587.5% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 320M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 320M
GeForce GT 320M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 132 votes

Rate GeForce GT 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4398 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 320M or GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.