Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile vs GeForce 940A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking788not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Gen. 12 Xe (2020)
GPU code nameGM108iDG1LPDEV
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)1 March 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed1029 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1124 MHz1500 MHz
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.98no data
Floating-point processing power0.8632 gflopsno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB3 GB
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed2002 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 1 March 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile has an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 940A and Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 940A is a desktop card while Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 940A
GeForce 940A
Intel Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile
Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3 votes

Rate GeForce 940A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.3 3 votes

Rate Xe DG1 (iDG1LP) Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.