ATI Radeon Xpress 200M vs GeForce 920A

Place in the ranking	920	1530
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	4.56	no data
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code name	GK208B	RC410
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	13 March 2015 (10 years ago)	2005 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	6
Core clock speed	954 MHz	336 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	350 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	107 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	30.53	0.67
Floating-point processing power	0.7327 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	8	2
TMUs	32	2
L1 Cache	32 KB	no data
L2 Cache	128 KB	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1001 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	16.02 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	2.0
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	3.5	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 920A 1.87
+3640%

ATI Xpress 200M 0.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 920A 829
+3668%

Samples: 25

ATI Xpress 200M 22
Samples: 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Dota 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Dota 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Hogwarts Legacy	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Valorant	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Valorant	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

1−2

+0%

1−2

+0%

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 25 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.87	0.05
Chip lithography	28 nm	130 nm

GeForce 920A has a 3640% higher aggregate performance score, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 920A is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 200M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

GeForce 920A

Radeon Xpress 200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Mobility Radeon HD 4870

Radeon Pro 575

HD 6770M Mac Edition

GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile

HD 6625M

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

HD 6630M Mac Edition

Iris Xe Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake)

GTX 950M Mac Edition

RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

GTX 860M OEM

Playstation 5 Pro GPU

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 16 votes

Rate GeForce 920A on a scale of 1 to 5:

3 46 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 920A or Radeon Xpress 200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.