ATI Radeon Xpress 1150 vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Radeon Xpress 1150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9400M (G) / ION (LE)
2008
12 Watt
0.30
+329%

9400M (G) / ION (LE) outperforms ATI Xpress 1150 by a whopping 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13361486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.77no data
Architectureno dataRage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameMCP79MXRS485
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date14 October 2008 (16 years ago)23 May 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores166
Core clock speed450 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data400 MHz
Number of transistors282 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Wattno data
Texture fill rateno data0.8
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.09.0
OpenGLno data2.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Valorant 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+8.3%
24−27
−8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is ahead in 18 tests (72%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (28%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 0.07
Recency 14 October 2008 23 May 2006
Chip lithography 65 nm 110 nm

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has a 328.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 69.2% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Xpress 1150 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
ATI Radeon Xpress 1150
Radeon Xpress 1150

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5
37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5
60 votes

Rate Radeon Xpress 1150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or Radeon Xpress 1150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.