Radeon PRO W7700 vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Place in the ranking	1317	61
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	56.20
Power efficiency	1.80	18.29
Architecture	no data	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	MCP79MX	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	14 October 2008 (16 years ago)	13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	3072
Core clock speed	450 MHz	1900 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	282 Million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	499.2
Floating-point processing power	no data	31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	96
TMUs	no data	192
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	no data	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	no data	16 GB
Memory bus width	no data	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	no data	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.2
Vulkan	-	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−14900%

300−310
+14900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −14900%	450−500 +14900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −14900%	300−310 +14900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −14900%	300−310 +14900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −14900%	600−650 +14900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −15525%	1250−1300 +15525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −14900%	600−650 +14900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −15971%	4500−4550 +15971%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −14900%	450−500 +14900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −14900%	300−310 +14900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −14900%	300−310 +14900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −14900%	600−650 +14900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −15525%	1250−1300 +15525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −14900%	600−650 +14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −15456%	1400−1450 +15456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −15971%	4500−4550 +15971%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −14900%	450−500 +14900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −14900%	300−310 +14900%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −14900%	300−310 +14900%
Hitman 3	4−5 −14900%	600−650 +14900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −15525%	1250−1300 +15525%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −14900%	600−650 +14900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −15456%	1400−1450 +15456%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −15971%	4500−4550 +15971%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −15733%	950−1000 +15733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −14900%	300−310 +14900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−14900%

300−310
+14900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −15900%	160−170 +15900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−14900%

300−310
+14900%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.31	49.84
Recency	14 October 2008	13 November 2023
Chip lithography	65 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	12 Watt	190 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 1483.3% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 15977.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook card while Radeon PRO W7700 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.