Radeon PRO V710 vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) with Radeon PRO V710, including specs and performance data.

9400M (G) / ION (LE)
2008
12 Watt
0.31

PRO V710 outperforms 9400M (G) / ION (LE) by a whopping 10545% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1357182
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.8414.85
Architectureno dataRDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameMCP79MXNavi 32
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 October 2008 (16 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163456
Core clock speed450 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rateno data432.0
Floating-point processing powerno data27.65 TFLOPS
ROPsno data96
TMUsno data216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountno data28 GB
Memory bus widthno data224 Bit
Memory clock speedno data2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data504.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.2
Vulkan-1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9900%
700−750
+9900%
Valorant 24−27
−10477%
2750−2800
+10477%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−10285%
1350−1400
+10285%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Dota 2 9−10
−10456%
950−1000
+10456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9900%
700−750
+9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−9900%
500−550
+9900%
Valorant 24−27
−10477%
2750−2800
+10477%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
Dota 2 9−10
−10456%
950−1000
+10456%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−9900%
700−750
+9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−9900%
500−550
+9900%
Valorant 24−27
−10477%
2750−2800
+10477%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dead Island 2 3−4
−9900%
300−310
+9900%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−9900%
100−105
+9900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−10525%
1700−1750
+10525%
Valorant 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Dead Island 2 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−10400%
210−220
+10400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.31 33.00
Recency 14 October 2008 3 October 2024
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 158 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 1216.7% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has a 10545.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO V710 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook card while Radeon PRO V710 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 37 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or Radeon PRO V710, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.