Radeon Instinct Vega vs GeForce 9200M GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1373not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.80no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG98Vega 20
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed550 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1500 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)13 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400no data
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops31no data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed700 MHz2400 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 13 Watt 225 Watt

9200M GS has 1630.8% lower power consumption.

Instinct Vega, on the other hand, has a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M GS and Radeon Instinct Vega. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Instinct Vega is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
GeForce 9200M GS
AMD Radeon Instinct Vega
Radeon Instinct Vega

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 29 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 42 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct Vega on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M GS or Radeon Instinct Vega, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.