Quadro T1000 vs GeForce 930MX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 930MX with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 930MX
2016
2 GB DDR3, GDDR5, 17 Watt
2.87

T1000 outperforms 930MX by a whopping 406% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking756340
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.4423.04
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM108TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 March 2016 (9 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed952 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1020 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)17 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate24.48no data
Floating-point processing power0.7834 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, GDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 930MX 2.87
Quadro T1000 14.52
+406%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 930MX 1284
Quadro T1000 6488
+405%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GeForce 930MX 5532
Quadro T1000 33786
+511%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GeForce 930MX 3967
Quadro T1000 29546
+645%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GeForce 930MX 5566
Quadro T1000 34236
+515%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD16
−400%
80−85
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
−400%
40−45
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 15
−400%
75−80
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Far Cry 5 11
−400%
55−60
+400%
Fortnite 37
−386%
180−190
+386%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 12
−400%
60−65
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 17
−400%
85−90
+400%
Valorant 45−50
−400%
240−250
+400%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12
−400%
60−65
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−400%
50−55
+400%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
−400%
290−300
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Dota 2 36
−400%
180−190
+400%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Fortnite 15
−400%
75−80
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Grand Theft Auto V 12
−400%
60−65
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Metro Exodus 2
−400%
10−11
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 15
−400%
75−80
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−400%
50−55
+400%
Valorant 45−50
−400%
240−250
+400%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−12
−400%
55−60
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Dota 2 33
−385%
160−170
+385%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−400%
75−80
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9
−400%
45−50
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
−400%
30−33
+400%
Valorant 45−50
−400%
240−250
+400%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−400%
85−90
+400%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−378%
110−120
+378%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−400%
130−140
+400%
Valorant 30−35
−384%
150−160
+384%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−380%
24−27
+380%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%
Valorant 16−18
−400%
80−85
+400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Dota 2 9−10
−400%
45−50
+400%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

This is how GeForce 930MX and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.87 14.52
Recency 1 March 2016 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 17 Watt 50 Watt

GeForce 930MX has 194.1% lower power consumption.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has a 405.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 930MX in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 930MX is a notebook card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
GeForce 930MX
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 424 votes

Rate GeForce 930MX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 446 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 930MX or Quadro T1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.