Quadro T1000 vs GeForce 930MX

Place in performance ranking	703	299
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.08	8.56
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N16S-GMR	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	10 March 2016 (8 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$1808	$920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro T1000 has 10600% better value for money than GeForce 930MX.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	no data
Core clock speed	952 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	1020 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	17 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	24.48	no data
Floating-point performance	783.4 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce 930MX and Quadro T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3, GDDR5	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	64 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	2000 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	2.0	no data
Optimus	+	no data
GameWorks	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.1.126	no data
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 930MX 3.34

Quadro T1000 16.99
+409%

Quadro T1000 outperforms GeForce 930MX by 409% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GeForce 930MX 1290

Quadro T1000 6569
+409%

Quadro T1000 outperforms GeForce 930MX by 409% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GeForce 930MX 5494

Quadro T1000 33831
+516%

Quadro T1000 outperforms GeForce 930MX by 516% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GeForce 930MX 4758

Quadro T1000 30279
+536%

Quadro T1000 outperforms GeForce 930MX by 536% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GeForce 930MX 5566

Quadro T1000 34236
+515%

Quadro T1000 outperforms GeForce 930MX by 515% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−400%

85−90
+400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

8
−400%

40−45

+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 −400%	50−55 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	9 −400%	45−50 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	15 −400%	75−80 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Hitman 3	12 −400%	60−65 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20 −400%	100−105 +400%
Metro Exodus	15 −400%	75−80 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	13 −400%	65−70 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 −400%	65−70 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9 −400%	45−50 +400%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Battlefield 5	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Far Cry 5	30 −400%	150−160 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Hitman 3	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16 −400%	80−85 +400%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Red Dead Redemption 2	11 −400%	55−60 +400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −380%	24−27 +380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 −400%	50−55 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −400%	60−65 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10 −400%	50−55 +400%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −400%	30−33 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
−400%

40−45

+400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Hitman 3	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −400%	40−45 +400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Far Cry New Dawn	0−1	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −400%	5−6 +400%