GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 vs 920A

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking852not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.55no data
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGK208BGT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (9 years ago)12 March 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed954 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors915 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Wattno data
Texture fill rate30.534.712
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs84
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s5.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.51.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2015 12 March 2011
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

GeForce 920A has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 920A and GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 920A is a notebook card while GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 920A
GeForce 920A
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 13 votes

Rate GeForce 920A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.