Radeon HD 8750M vs E6760

Place in performance ranking	816	789
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.22	0.25
Architecture	TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)	GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code name	Turks	Mars Pro
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	2 May 2011 (13 years ago)	16 November 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$239.99	no data
Current price	$90 (0.4x MSRP)	$338

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

HD 8750M has 14% better value for money than Radeon E6760.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	480	384
Core clock speed	600 MHz	620 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	775 MHz
Number of transistors	716 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	14.40	18.60
Floating-point performance	576.0 gflops	595.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Radeon E6760 and Radeon HD 8750M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x8
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3200 MHz	2000 - 4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.0	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.0	5.1
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Radeon E6760 2.27

HD 8750M 2.55
+12.3%

HD 8750M outperforms E6760 by 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Radeon E6760 876

HD 8750M 986
+12.6%

HD 8750M outperforms E6760 by 13% in Passmark.