ATI Radeon E4690 vs GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800M GTX SLI with Radeon E4690, including specs and performance data.

8800M GTX SLI
2007
512 MB GDDR3, 130 Watt
1.91
+96.9%

8800M SLI outperforms E4690 by an impressive 97% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9491166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.132.49
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameNB8E-GTXRV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)1 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192320
Core clock speed500 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million514 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data19.20
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-II
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 1−2 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Fortnite 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Valorant 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Fortnite 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Valorant 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Dota 2 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Valorant 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Valorant 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+100%
7−8
−100%
Valorant 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 0.97
Recency 19 November 2007 1 June 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 30 Watt

8800M GTX SLI has a 96.9% higher aggregate performance score.

ATI E4690, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 18.2% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon E4690 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon E4690 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
ATI Radeon E4690
Radeon E4690

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTX SLI or Radeon E4690, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.