ATI Radeon E4690 vs GeForce 8400M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400M G with Radeon E4690, including specs and performance data.

8400M G
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.25

E4690 outperforms 8400M G by a whopping 288% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14261164
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.922.49
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameG86RV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date9 May 2007 (18 years ago)1 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8320
Core clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors210 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20019.20
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs832
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-II
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)10.1
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.0
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8400M G 0.25
ATI E4690 0.97
+288%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400M G 105
Samples: 97
ATI E4690 405
+286%
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
Valorant 24−27
−280%
95−100
+280%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−285%
50−55
+285%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Valorant 24−27
−280%
95−100
+280%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Dota 2 9−10
−233%
30−33
+233%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−286%
27−30
+286%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−260%
18−20
+260%
Valorant 24−27
−280%
95−100
+280%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−233%
10−11
+233%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−257%
50−55
+257%
Valorant 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−250%
7−8
+250%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 0.97
Recency 9 May 2007 1 June 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 30 Watt

8400M G has 200% lower power consumption.

ATI E4690, on the other hand, has a 288% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 45.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon E4690 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M G in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M G is a notebook graphics card while Radeon E4690 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8400M G
GeForce 8400M G
ATI Radeon E4690
Radeon E4690

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M G or Radeon E4690, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.