Radeon RX 560 896SP vs GeForce 8800M GTX SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking949not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.12no data
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameNB8E-GTXPolaris 21
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date19 November 2007 (18 years ago)4 July 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192896
Core clock speed500 MHz1090 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1175 MHz
Number of transistors1508 Million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rateno data65.80
Floating-point processing powerno data2.106 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data56
L1 Cacheno data224 KB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x8
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 19 November 2007 4 July 2017
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 45 Watt

RX 560 896SP has an age advantage of 9 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 188.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800M GTX SLI and Radeon RX 560 896SP. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800M GTX SLI is a notebook graphics card while Radeon RX 560 896SP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
GeForce 8800M GTX SLI
AMD Radeon RX 560 896SP
Radeon RX 560 896SP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate GeForce 8800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 15 votes

Rate Radeon RX 560 896SP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800M GTX SLI or Radeon RX 560 896SP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.